Heheh they work at top chambers, way out of your price range, probably. One has been nominated as barrister of the year a few times by the law society.
You have no idea as to my income level or what I can afford.
Perhaps these lawyers, who take such 'pride' in their ability to understand a case "on the hoof" with just a "quick read of the salient parts" should remember that pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.
Chiacchiera was saying that 'he knew' that a shower had supposedly been reported. He didn't actually verify himself there had been a shower taken.
MaCh:
Of the bathrooms, if I take a shower in a bathroom where I find faeces instinctively pull the drain, in short.
MC:
Yes, but the feces were on the other bathroom.
MaCh:
Yes, yes, I understand, however, in short, somehow is instinctive, no, to pull the drain. The fact is that ...
GCM:
Excuse me, do you know how many bathrooms there were in the house?
MaCh:
Two.
GCM:
Two bathrooms. Sorry, please. Do you know that a shower was taken?
MaCh:
Yup.
GCM:
How do you know?
MaCh:
I know it because it's something that I can not, I think, report because it was ...
GCM:
But you have verified ...
MaCh:
I try to be very very careful.
GB:
President, we are talking about nothing.
http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/Marco_Chiacchiera's_Testimony
So your claim Chiacchiera investigated the shower and confirmed it is a complete nothing burger.
Ummm...no. I never said he "investigated" the shower. I said that
he said a shower had been taken. Which he did as quoted above. Neither did Chiacchiera say he knew a "shower had been reported". He said "
I know it because it's something that
I can not, I think, report ". Notice the subject is "I" and not "it". Try again.
Additionally, Bongiorno asked him about the shower again:
GB: You said, it can be seen in the transcription, that another anomaly would be given by the fact that, indeed/in fact, Knox took a shower in a bathroom, and in the same moment, you said verbatim – because I wrote it here – you said “to me, this seemed anomalous, because if I see faeces in the toilet, I flush the toilet, and I don’t take a shower”.
MaCh: Yes, I was wrong: she didn’t take the shower there.
GB: She didn’t take the shower there. You see, therefore, that this is your error...
He is correcting his error in stating that Knox took a shower
in Laura and Filomena's bathroom but does not say she did not take a shower in her own.
Why you think the JUDGE saying "we are talking about nothing" somehow negates what Chiacchierra had just said?
By the way, I'm still waiting for the "negative question" you claim explains Chiacchiera's answer of "yes".
He also says:
Was it in all the rooms or just in some rooms?
MaCh:
"I was in Romanelli's room, where the stone was. I entered the corridor, along the corridor, which I remember. I looked at all the various traces that were inside the bath. I saw the feces, so I also went into the other bathroom. "
So, in effect Chiachiarra kept his distance from the small bathroom as he feared contamination of the scene.
LOL! I do so love it when you hoist yourself with your own petard. Chiacchiera did
not say he didn't go into the bathroom;
he said he didn't go into Meredith's bedroom but he did go into both bathrooms. Try reading it again but very slowly this time.
That's weird. A healthcare worker like yourself not knowing that heroin is classed as a depressant. So categorised because it has a depressant effect on the autonomous nervous system (ANS)..
Hey, leave Trump alone, we share a common ancestor, apparently.
This is the second time you have claimed I am a healthcare worker and this is the second time I will correct you. I am not a healthcare worker and never have been. Please try and remember that. However, I do know that heroin is a depressant. I also know that heroin creates a "high" in the sense of a feeling of euphoria. This has already been pointed out to you.
Why am I not surprised that you share a common ancestor with Trump? I can see the resemblance in your inability to ever admit error.
). Normal people would have either said nothing, or (much more favourably still, and intellectually-honestly) would have said something like "Oh OK, I was wrong to think that depressant drugs such as heroin did not produce highs for users. Sorry". Not you though, eh, Vixen....?
