You have zero intention of answering my direct question, don't you?
You're still not trying
Researchers suggest earthquake lightning may be due to cracks forming in Earth's surface
Last edited:
You have zero intention of answering my direct question, don't you?
Unfortunately Haig, neither of those citations support your hypothesis.A team of four researchers from several universities in the U.S. has given a presentation at this year's American Physical Society meeting, outlining a theory they are developing to help explain a phenomenon known as earthquake lightning..
The lightning rate increase is corroborated by an increase in the total number of thunder days observed by UK Met stations, again persisting for around 40 d after the arrival of a high speed solar wind stream
Let me ask you Traker the same question that Jrrarglblarg failed to answer or respond to in any meaningful way.
What do you think the mechanism is linking the solar wind to the frequency of lighting here on Earth ?
Sure, I'm not a scientist like you, just a numpty...
Truer words were never spoken. So why do you feel qualified to gainsay real scientists? Oh, that's right, you're a no-claimer who doesn't stand behind the links you post.
There is a lie, HaigAnd here is the start of the up-tick![]()
Wrong, Haig, the obsession with a deluded YouTube channel is your problem along with several others:That's a problem for you not me![]()
Oh dear, Haig - now you do not know what volcanoes are (they are not the Sun or earthquakes
Well, Haig, the ignorance, lies and delusions of a crank video have been speaking for themselves for several weeks now - why have you not been listening?Well the facts speak for themselves so ...
They sure do Haig; but, unsurprisingly, they're not saying what you keep insisting they're saying.Well the facts speak for themselves so it doesn't really matter that it's a numpty posting it but actually, when you think about it, it's hilarious
Earthspots News, Space Weather Report | S0 News May 24, 2015
None of which has anything to do with your claims that solar activity and earthquakes are linked. Stop trying to divert attention form your failure and provide evidence.A team of four researchers from several universities in the U.S. has given a presentation at this year's American Physical Society meeting, outlining a theory they are developing to help explain a phenomenon known as earthquake lightning..
The lightning rate increase is corroborated by an increase in the total number of thunder days observed by UK Met stations, again persisting for around 40 d after the arrival of a high speed solar wind stream
Well the facts speak for themselves so it doesn't really matter that it's a numpty posting it...
...but actually, when you think about it, it's hilarious![]()
Well the facts speak for themselves
Since by your own admission you know pretty much nothing about science, what makes you think you have the necessary knowledge to both spot and interpret said facts ?
ABSTRACT A few studies convincingly demonstrated that the magnetic fields induced by the lunar semidiurnal (M2) ocean flow can be identified in satellite observations. This result encourages using M2 satellite magnetic data to constrain subsurface electrical conductivity in oceanic regions. Traditional satellite-based induction studies using signals of magnetospheric origin are mostly sensitive to deep conducting structures because of the inductive coupling between primary and induced sources. In contrast, galvanic coupling from the oceanic tidal signal allows for studying less conductive, shallower structures. We perform global 3-D electromagnetic numerical simulations to investigate the sensitivity of M2 signals to conductivity distributions at different depths. The results of our sensitivity analysis suggest it will be promising to use M2 oceanic signals detected at satellite altitude for probing lithospheric and upper mantle conductivity. Our simulations also suggest that M2 seafloor electric and magnetic field data may provide complementary details to better constrain lithospheric conductivity.
That is wrong, Haig.Simples, I can look at the facts and make my own mind up.![]()

Can you understand that Schnepf et. al is not about the Sun or earthquakes?
---- snip ---
which is not about the Sun or earthquakes!
No, Haig, I am not stupid enough to look at any of Ben Davidson's delusions.It's part of the mechanism RC look at ...