Haig and his Sun caused earthquakes

Let me ask you Traker the same question that Jrrarglblarg failed to answer or respond to in any meaningful way.

What do you think the mechanism is linking the solar wind to the frequency of lighting here on Earth ?

Demonstrate the evidence compellingly linking solar wind to earthquakes.
 
Haig, all kind of different objects, phenomena and substances can create electrical discharge. "Lighting" is just an electrical potential difference between two somethings discharging through an atmosphere. But that doesn't mean all electrical discharges have the same source. If I rub my shoes across the rug and go touch Mrs J on the earlobe the visible static elecric spark has absolutely nothing to do with solar anything or the Electromawhachamcalit theory. It's just electrons scrubbed off my shoes into the carpet or vice versa creating a potential difference between me and all the other Ugly Bags Of Mostly Water in the room.
 
Sure, I'm not a scientist like you, just a numpty...

Truer words were never spoken. So why do you feel qualified to gainsay real scientists? Oh, that's right, you're a no-claimer who doesn't stand behind the links you post.
 
Well the facts speak for themselves so ...
Well, Haig, the ignorance, lies and delusions of a crank video have been speaking for themselves for several weeks now - why have you not been listening?
We can guess - what we see is that you are gullible enough to fall for obviously crank ideas that are floating around the internet and not willing to escape their clammy clutches: 7th November 2010 Haig: Support for electric comet delusion that comets are rocks despite the empirical science that they are less dense then water!

If you cannot understand the fact that 0.6 g/cc (measured density of comets) is less than 3.0 g/cc (measured density of asteroids) then you certainly will never understand the simple science that
* that correlation is not causation
* cheery picked examples in crank videos are not even correlation!
 
Last edited:
Well the facts speak for themselves so it doesn't really matter that it's a numpty posting it...

But Haig, you've just admitted you're a non-scientist and therefore incapable of separating fact from baloney.

...but actually, when you think about it, it's hilarious :p


Ah, thanks for flying your true colors; they tell me all I need to know about your sincerity.

Well, I'm gioing to take off; I just wish I could nuke this thread from orbit.
 
Since by your own admission you know pretty much nothing about science, what makes you think you have the necessary knowledge to both spot and interpret said facts ?


Simples, I can look at the facts and make my own mind up. :D

Do you think taxpayers only have to pay for publicly funded science and not have an opinion ?

Facts in support of solar events triggering of earthquakes, volcanoes, major storms etc :D

The Calm. Planets Lining Up Again | S0 News May 26, 2015

Can we probe the conductivity of the lithosphere and upper mantle using satellite tidal magnetic signals?: Satellite tidal magnetic signals
ABSTRACT A few studies convincingly demonstrated that the magnetic fields induced by the lunar semidiurnal (M2) ocean flow can be identified in satellite observations. This result encourages using M2 satellite magnetic data to constrain subsurface electrical conductivity in oceanic regions. Traditional satellite-based induction studies using signals of magnetospheric origin are mostly sensitive to deep conducting structures because of the inductive coupling between primary and induced sources. In contrast, galvanic coupling from the oceanic tidal signal allows for studying less conductive, shallower structures. We perform global 3-D electromagnetic numerical simulations to investigate the sensitivity of M2 signals to conductivity distributions at different depths. The results of our sensitivity analysis suggest it will be promising to use M2 oceanic signals detected at satellite altitude for probing lithospheric and upper mantle conductivity. Our simulations also suggest that M2 seafloor electric and magnetic field data may provide complementary details to better constrain lithospheric conductivity.
 
Haig: Can you understand that Schnepf et. al is not about the Sun or earthquakes

Simples, I can look at the facts and make my own mind up. :D
That is wrong, Haig.
You have not looked at the facts about the Sun and earthquakes as noted over 3 weeks ago or even the facts about any of the crank ideas you have fallen for:

27 May 2015 Haig: Can you understand that Schnepf et. al is not about the Sun or earthquakes?
Can we probe the conductivity of the lithosphere and upper mantle using satellite tidal magnetic signals?: Satellite tidal magnetic signals[/QUOTE] which is not about the Sun or earthquakes!

Anyone can have an opinion, Haig. But when that opinion is based on an obsession with a crank YouTube channel run by the rather obviously deluded Ben Davidson then we will all have a good laugh at that opinion. When that opinion is based on denial of even reading comprehension then it deserves a
:dl:
 
Last edited:
If that YouTube vid has anything to do with increased tectonic activity because the planets have lined up then the guy is deluded, and quite incapable of doing the maths to figure out any increased stress caused by the planetary alignment, ie bugger all.

As for the second link, I'll echo RC, it has nothing whatsoever to do with sun caused earthquakes. Do you just do a random search on "magnetism", "earth" and "electric" and assume any paper you come up with is proof? Because that's exactly what it seems like to me.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom