The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

I am sure it would be possible to find real physicists who would support Wolynski's theory. They might sound something like this:

Manuscript fragment said:
Forsooth, the Hypothesis, advanced by Wolynski of Florida, mayhaps hath some merit. It seems to conform well to Ptolemy's Principles of Argumentation and Doctor Rheticus here finds in it agreement with the Humours. It appears that further Understanding might be obtained by the new Mathematikal Principles rumored developed in Cambridge. Alas no Manuscript of these principles have reached us.

However, here in Wittenburg we no longer have any skilful Calculators, since Doctor Otho was taken suddenly by Typhus this midwinter. Therefore, we would be unable to apply the newest physicomathematical Principles to "stellar metamorphosis" even if Doctor Newton's book were obtained promptly. It is regretted that Wolynsky's Hypothesis must remain in its primitive state. Perhaps in a few years its Author might himself obtain some divers Manuscripts and catch up with the new scientifick Arts. Or perhaps new Physical Laws or Calculators might be invented in the near Future, and we might find divers and sundry Methods for testing hypotheses such as this. Time will tell."
Click to expand...
 
jeffreyw: Repeating the delusion that stars become planets does not make it happen

jeffreyw said:
In the accepted geology/geophysics departments....
Click to expand...
A post about a delusion that stars become planets is not geology or geophysics jeffreyw.
Ignorance about uniformitarianism does not make a delusion correct. This a "first principle". If there is no evidence of sudden changes then the assumption is gradual changes.

21 March 2016 jeffreyw: Repeating the delusion that stars become planets does not make it happen.
 
jeffreyw: A delusion about chemistry inside stars based on stars to planets delusion

jeffreyw said:
...The majority of chemical reactions in the universe take place inside of stars as they cool and die, not in the interstellar medium.
Click to expand...
21 March 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion about chemistry inside stars based on the delusion that stars become planets.
Is this the need to change light elements into heavy elements (stars to super massive planets)?
Or just the idiocy of chemical reactions cannot happen in space so must happen in the 1000's of degrees of stellar plasma?
 
jeffreyw: The delusion that "Neptune and Uranus are pre-ocean worlds"

jeffreyw said:
Basically Neptune and Uranus are pre-ocean worlds. ....
Click to expand...
21 March 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that "Neptune and Uranus are pre-ocean worlds" via YouTube video this time!
Neptune (No surface! Temperature of 72 K at 1 bar :eye-poppi)
Uranus (No surface! 76 K Temperature of at 1 bar :eye-poppi)
 
jeffreyw said:
http://vixra.org/pdf/1602.0309v1.pdf

Since it is known that new stars cool, evolve and die to become what are called planets via the General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis, we can set up a basic principle of astrochemistry to streamline a huge amount of inquiry into the matter.

[B]"The majority of chemical reactions in the universe take place inside of stars as they cool and die, not in the interstellar medium. "[/B]



The purpose of this paper and statement is to redirect scientists towards stars as being the location for thermochemical, electrochemical and photochemical reactions. They are the locations for the majority of the radiation production, and the majority of the chemical reactions which occur in outer space. Stars form chemicals in huge amounts, and as they die, evolve and disintegrate themselves and other older stars, the material then floats about in the interstellar medium after the fact, as a direct result of flaring, CME’s, solar wind, photoevaporation and even impact events. Any studies that ignore stars as being the locations for the majority of chemical synthesis and/or decomposition reactions is misguided.
Click to expand...

NO ( Note, a lack of red marking does not indicate correctness, merely not the major strand of incorrectness here!!!) Stars only form the elements through Iron and Iron kills them. They do not form any compounds - way too hot to.
 
Last edited:
jeffreyw said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-eDccSnJ4U

I forgot to post this one! Ooops! This was for Baz who was making the video overviewing the evolution of heat in stellar interiors. Basically the cooler regions of the star start out internal, and the heat is external. Over the star's evolution, the heat internalizes and the exterior cools, so it goes backwards.

So the older stars will be hot internally, the younger ones hot externally and shining.

Eventually the interior also cools, but since the insulating capacity of thick atmosphere prevents a large portion of heat loss, it cools very slowly as it forms the interior *planet*.
Click to expand...


TL:DR version:

Oven heats Soup. Outside of soup hot, inside of soup cool (No stirring)
Oven stops heating soup. Outside of soup congeals forming an insulating layer, inside of soup hot.
And that is how planets are born.
 
jeffreyw said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-eDccSnJ4U

I forgot to post this one! Ooops! This was for Baz who was making the video overviewing the evolution of heat in stellar interiors. Basically the cooler regions of the star start out internal, and the heat is external. Over the star's evolution, the heat internalizes and the exterior cools, so it goes backwards.

So the older stars will be hot internally, the younger ones hot externally and shining.

Eventually the interior also cools, but since the insulating capacity of thick atmosphere prevents a large portion of heat loss, it cools very slowly as it forms the interior *planet*.
Click to expand...

A couple of rather ugly drawings on a piece of paper isnt proof of anything, I think even you understands that or do you?
 
Hold up guys and gals, he still has 250 more posts before he can respond to us.
 
jeffreyw: The delusion that stars have cooler "interior regions"

jeffreyw said:
...I fhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6fGZ0aS7Ikorgot to post this one!....
Click to expand...
Yet more of the delusion that stars became planets from jeffreyw presented in a deluded YouTube video :jaw-dropp.
Here we have the delusion that "the younger ones [stars] hot externally and shining". The overwhelming evidence that stars are heated (hotter) from within by fusion makes this a delusion.
22 March 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that stars have cooler "interior regions".

The list of bad science has really grown! That is the problem with posting links to so many crank videos and PDFs - they emphasize just how bad the entire stars become planets delusion is.
  1. 15th January 2015 jeffreyw: That is a video containing an ignorant fantasy about how planets were formed. The Sun is 333,000 Earth masses!
  2. 23rd January 2015 jeffreyw: The nebular hypothesis uses conservation of angular momentum!
  3. 19 February 2015 jeffreyw: A Short Irrelevant YouTube Video Rant + Ignorance
  4. 19 February 2015 jeffreyw: The scientific theory of comets is still valid and accepted
  5. 19 February 2015 jeffreyw: You have an extremely ignorant video abut comets including a lie about the "Rosetta mission has shown quite clearly that comets are not big ice balls".
  6. 13th July 2015 jeffreyw: The physical facts make planets being stars into a delusion.
  7. 15th July 2015 jeffreyw: In that video you repeat the delusion that planets are stars!
  8. 15th July 2015 jeffreyw: Delusional Concepts Concerning Stellar Evolution [/
  9. 27 August 2015 jeffreyw: Please answer these questions about the basics of your theory.
  10. 28 August 2015 jeffreyw: Please give your evidence that the theory and experimental confirmation of neutrino oscillation has been faked.
  11. 28 August 2015 jeffreyw: Please supply a list of the other fake processes and your evidence that they were faked.
  12. 18 March 2016 jeffreyw: A lie about stellar fusion being pseudoscience.
  13. 18 March 2016 jeffreyw: A lie about "18th century beliefs that have been fully falsified by exo-planets".
  14. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that water and life can exist at 76 K on Uranus (also repeated in the next post).
  15. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that scientists are not searching fro signs of life in the Solar System and elsewhere but we are currently doing this on Mars and by SETI!
  16. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that Neptune and Uranus are ocean worlds with life :eye-poppi!
  17. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: A fantasy abut dust grains in a PDF on a PDF upload web site based on your delusion about stars becoming planets.
  18. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that Venus and Mercury are black dwarf stars (~50,000 Earth masses!)
  19. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: Repeating the delusion that stars become planets does not make it happen.
  20. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion about chemistry inside stars based on the delusion that stars become planets.
  21. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that "Neptune and Uranus are pre-ocean worlds" via YouTube video this time!
I have missed out some of the worst videos from jeffreyw, e.g. a video with the insanity that Neptune and Uranus should not exist copied from a deluded creationist web site! And another video with the delusion that the Sun is treated as a "perpetual energy machine".
 
Last edited:
Reality Check said:
Yet more of the delusion that stars became planets from jeffreyw presented in a deluded YouTube video :jaw-dropp.
Here we have the delusion that "the younger ones [stars] hot externally and shining". The overwhelming evidence that stars are heated (hotter) from within by fusion makes this a delusion.
22 March 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that stars have cooler "interior regions".

The list of bad science has really grown! That is the problem with posting links to so many crank videos and PDFs - they emphasize just how bad the entire stars become planets delusion is.
  1. 15th January 2015 jeffreyw: That is a video containing an ignorant fantasy about how planets were formed. The Sun is 333,000 Earth masses!
  2. 23rd January 2015 jeffreyw: The nebular hypothesis uses conservation of angular momentum!
  3. 19 February 2015 jeffreyw: A Short Irrelevant YouTube Video Rant + Ignorance
  4. 19 February 2015 jeffreyw: The scientific theory of comets is still valid and accepted
  5. 19 February 2015 jeffreyw: You have an extremely ignorant video abut comets including a lie about the "Rosetta mission has shown quite clearly that comets are not big ice balls".
  6. 13th July 2015 jeffreyw: The physical facts make planets being stars into a delusion.
  7. 15th July 2015 jeffreyw: In that video you repeat the delusion that planets are stars!
  8. 15th July 2015 jeffreyw: Delusional Concepts Concerning Stellar Evolution [/
  9. 27 August 2015 jeffreyw: Please answer these questions about the basics of your theory.
  10. 28 August 2015 jeffreyw: Please give your evidence that the theory and experimental confirmation of neutrino oscillation has been faked.
  11. 28 August 2015 jeffreyw: Please supply a list of the other fake processes and your evidence that they were faked.
  12. 18 March 2016 jeffreyw: A lie about stellar fusion being pseudoscience.
  13. 18 March 2016 jeffreyw: A lie about "18th century beliefs that have been fully falsified by exo-planets".
  14. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that water and life can exist at 76 K on Uranus (also repeated in the next post).
  15. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that scientists are not searching fro signs of life in the Solar System and elsewhere but we are currently doing this on Mars and by SETI!
  16. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that Neptune and Uranus are ocean worlds with life :eye-poppi!
  17. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: A fantasy abut dust grains in a PDF on a PDF upload web site based on your delusion about stars becoming planets.
  18. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that Venus and Mercury are black dwarf stars (~50,000 Earth masses!)
  19. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: Repeating the delusion that stars become planets does not make it happen.
  20. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion about chemistry inside stars based on the delusion that stars become planets.
  21. 21 March 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that "Neptune and Uranus are pre-ocean worlds" via YouTube video this time!
I have missed out some of the worst videos from jeffreyw, e.g. a video with the insanity that Neptune and Uranus should not exist copied from a deluded creationist web site! And another video with the delusion that the Sun is treated as a "perpetual energy machine".
Click to expand...

No you're wrong.

Jeffrey has stuff on Youtube. What have you ever done besides write long posts with lots of complicated words in them?
 
Jeffreyw, maybe you can help me with some chemistry questions. I found some rust on my car, which some scientist told me is iron combining with oxygen to form hydrated hematite. I am worried because minerals can only form inside of stars, according to Stellar Metamorphosis theory. Has someone been stealing my car and parking it inside the Sun when I'm not looking? Help!

(If it helps: this is the drivers' side door.)
 
EHocking said:
http://geology.com/meteorites/iron-meteorites.shtml
Would you care to discuss the actual explanation?
Click to expand...

Jeffrey,
Please read the link. Positing long "this is how I think it should work" hypotheses, without actually understanding what you're talking about, has only added another data point to the map of scientific disciplines that you lack basic knowledge in.

Such public proclamations of ignorance are hardly good practice in any discipline and suggests a serious lack of self awareness. You really need to get out of whatever echo chamber it is that's being an enabler for this nonsense.
 
I thought about reporting jeffrey's latest spam-fest here, but then I thought...nah, let it lie, jeffrey's his own worst enemy. Every single time he drops a link without bothering to respond to questions is an illustration to anyone with eyes of the difference between preaching a heedless faith and teaching a correctable science.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom