It all sounds very reasonable to me.
Any chance we could get a link?
Oh dear, jeffreyw - the everything is ropes crank Bill Gaede with his screeds of YouTube videos and no scienceBecause you can see how reasonable it is, I will link you to the first video Mr. Bill Gaede ....
?This is the real SunAccording to radiometric dating and other sources of evidence, Earth formed about 4.54 billion years ago.
The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on spectral class and it is informally referred to as a yellow dwarf. It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][9][18] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter within a region of a large molecular cloud.
Thank you.
like gas giants adopting their previously existing moons and what not.
Wait, what? Where do moons come from if not really old, really small stars? Consistency please.
Oh dear, jeffreyw - the everything is ropes crank Bill Gaede with his screeds of YouTube videos and no science?
This is the idiot with the "youstupidrelativist" web site (not worth linking to). His abysmal ignorance of all physics is worse then yours.
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: Does not know an implied endorsement by the ignorant crank Bill Gaede is a bad idea!
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusional YouTube Video "Earth is older than the Sun!"!
This is the real Earth
This is the real Sun
Thank you.
like gas giants adopting their previously existing moons and what not.
QUOTE]
Wait, what? Where do moons come from if not really old, really small stars? Consistency please.
If the moon is differentiated with an iron/nickel core it is the remains of an ancient dead star.
Moons are really old, dead stars if they are differentiated with iron/nickel cores. If there is no differentiation then they are impact remains. I thought this was already covered?
Please do not continue to waste my time. That's why I haven't been responding to these comments. They show you haven't been reading the theory.
That is an ignorant statement, jeffreyw: If a moon is differentiated with an iron/nickel core then it is a moon (not a star or planet) with an iron/nickel core.If the moon is differentiated with an iron/nickel core it is the remains of an ancient dead star.
Persisting in abysmal ignorance and delusions cannot crush anything except your own intelligence, jeffreyw. Relying on the abysmal ignorance and delusions of other cranks will not help either.I am going to do everything in my power to crush establishment dogma ...
!That is an ignorant statement, jeffreyw: If a moon is differentiated with an iron/nickel core then it is a moon (not a star or planet) with an iron/nickel core.
A star has measured properties including being maybe millions of times heavier than a moon and having a totally different composition from moons
Persisting in abysmal ignorance and delusions cannot crush anything except your own intelligence, jeffreyw. Relying on the abysmal ignorance and delusions of other cranks will not help either.
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that something called "establishment dogma" exists.
What exists is mainstream science backed up with evidence that millions of physics students have learned, e.g. the masses of stars and planets, etc. that make your ideas into delusions.
Read the pit of ignorance and delusion (and some lies) you have been digging yourself deeper into: 17 June 2016 jeffreyw: 37 items of ignorance and delusion since 15th January 2015
- 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion from 27 December 2014 - establishment science does not have life forming on comets.
- 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: The 27 December 2014 delusion that plasma at temperatures of stars have "electrochemical" and "redox" reactions.
- 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: The 27 December 2014 delusion that stars are not powered by fusion (we detect the neutrinos from that fusion from the Sun!)
- 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: The 27 December 2014 delusion that life forms on stars - the Earth is not a star now and was not a star when life originated here.
- 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: Conspiracy theory fantasy about peer review.
- 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: A lie that stars are "big hot and bright" by tradition - it is observations and measurements that establish this.
- 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: A lie that planets are "small, cold and dim" by tradition - it is observations and measurements that establish this.
- 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: A lie that " Nobody seems to have asked the question, "what happens when stars don't shine anymore?"".
- 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: New stars are observed to from collapsing gas clouds, not imaginary Bennett pinches.
- 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: It is not difficult to understand that stars are hundreds of thousands of times heavier than planets and remain that heavy when they cool down
!
- 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: The idiocy of labeling astronomers as "creationists"
!
- 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: Does not know an implied endorsement by the ignorant crank Bill Gaede is a bad idea!
- 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusional YouTube Video "Earth is older than the Sun!"!
Stars do not lose the amount of mass you want them to lose in order to match your delusion that planets are stars.Stars lose mass.
We read:I can break it down:...
I know that pointing out ignorance, delusions and lies to a crank is unlikely to have any effect....are wasting your time.
!
!Stars do not lose the amount of mass you want them to lose in order to match your delusion that planets are stars.
No star loses 99.99% of its mass. Stars in general age and become white dwarf stars, neutron stars or black holes.
No star will ever become rocky as in a planet.
Understand a basic fact abut the universe - it will not obey your fantasies :eek!
I know that pointing out ignorance, delusions and lies to a crank is unlikely to have any effect.
It is never a waste of time to document the ignorance, delusions and lies of a crank for everyone in the world to reread for however long the Internet lasts. From now on when people look up 'General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis', this thread will appear!
Read the pit of ignorance and delusion (and some lies) you have been digging yourself deeper into: 17 June 2016 jeffreyw: 37 items of ignorance and delusion since 15th January 2015
14 new items - another 6 and I will merge this into a 57 items of ignorance and delusion since 15th January 2015 list.
- 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion from 27 December 2014 - establishment science does not have life forming on comets.
- 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: The 27 December 2014 delusion that plasma at temperatures of stars have "electrochemical" and "redox" reactions.
- 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: The 27 December 2014 delusion that stars are not powered by fusion (we detect the neutrinos from that fusion from the Sun!)
- 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: The 27 December 2014 delusion that life forms on stars - the Earth is not a star now and was not a star when life originated here.
- 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: Conspiracy theory fantasy about peer review.
- 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: A lie that stars are "big hot and bright" by tradition - it is observations and measurements that establish this.
- 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: A lie that planets are "small, cold and dim" by tradition - it is observations and measurements that establish this.
- 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: A lie that " Nobody seems to have asked the question, "what happens when stars don't shine anymore?"".
- 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: New stars are observed to from collapsing gas clouds, not imaginary Bennett pinches.
- 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: It is not difficult to understand that stars are hundreds of thousands of times heavier than planets and remain that heavy when they cool down
!
- 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: The idiocy of labeling astronomers as "creationists"
!
- 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: Does not know an implied endorsement by the ignorant crank Bill Gaede is a bad idea!
- 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusional YouTube Video "Earth is older than the Sun!"!
- 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that something called "establishment dogma" exists.
More ignorance leading to a delusion, jeffreyw?They have been teaching you that stars are fusion reactors ...
Fusion occurs in birthing galaxies. Eddington's 1920's delusion can suck it compared to radio observations.More ignorance leading to a delusion, jeffreyw?
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The ignorant delusion that stars are not fusion powered.
"They" do not teach this. Astronomy students work out fro themselves that the sun is fusion powered using the known laws of physics. Simply put:
Physics students also learn abut the history of astronomy and how alternative scientific explanations have been shown to be wrong by producing short lived stars. No fuel burning. No heat from gravitational collapse, no heat from fission, etc.
- Balance gravity against pressure to give stable balls of gas. This gives an equation for the pressure at any depth within a star, e.g. its core.
- Use the gas laws to derive the temperature at the core of a star given the pressure.
- Use nuclear physics to show that the temperature and pressure at the core of a star means fusion has to happen.
- More advanced: Calculate the neutrino flux from the fusion that matches the energy output of the Sun. Test this against the observed neutrino flux and see that they match.
Of course they do not learn about whatever delusion you have to replace fusion.