And yet again the brilliant glow of your understanding shines through. Given that with the word "Right", you just agreed with my point that the jets are not light at all, but are made up of mainly nuclei and electrons,
It’s also EM valves. These can even reach other galaxies and be dangerous to those there maybe lives there…
why would you then start babbling about what light does in black holes?
I have the same right to believe, - as you have, as Stephen Hawking & Co have and as well as everybody else..
What light does is irrelevant to the fact that the structures you point at are not, in fact, light.
Right
When lights is affected by extremely stretches space, light too will stretch, and hence change frequencym and you can't see it.
Further, the great thing about jets like that is that the existence of black holes is utterly irrelevant. Matter is thrown out of accretion discs in jets normal to the plane of the disc due to some bits of physics involving gravity and angular momentum. But the important point is that the gravitational body at the centre doesn't matter in the slightest - all that is important is for it to sit there being a source of gravity. You could pretend black holes don't exist at all and just imagine a really big lump of rock in the same position, and you would still get exactly the same jets. The properties of black holes are completely irrelevant to things that never actually reaches the black hole - all that matters in that case is its gravity.
The cause of the jest is not known, there are only hypothesis.
Once again all what I
claims (not what I mention I believe, but what I claims) is all build on
consequences of the same innocent and simple assumption that: matter contracts space
This simple assumption (as mentioned many times) also means:
that if matter moves spaces do as well.
This is not a totally blind
consequence but already well supported by the fact that we already know that something’s happens with space when matter moves.
Normally we call the result of that: a magnetic field.
I call this (fundamentally) space in motion. (SW)
This is what a magnetism really field is.
Therefore, if matter falls into a black holes,
space will follows that matter, and hence
space will “spin” into the black hole as well.
A “spinning magnetic field” pointing towards the black hole is born.
This also mean that matter will be stronger attracted because of the magnetic field, and hence matter will speed up.
If matter speed up the spinning magnetic field will be stronger.
It’s a self self-perpetuating process, and yes this magnetic field is pointing towards the centre in the black hole. (not because I want it, but because it
must)
And as mentioned this is not something
I believe, but a simple “facts” if it is correct that matter and space is connected.
You already
know that space and matter is connected, so I am not completely alone far out On Jens Peter Jensen ploughed field.
Remember if Andromeda had an active black hole pointing to us, the jet could reach us with deadly effect. We are talking about a huge force.
Bjarne
I mean Stephen Hawking had a 10 years headache trying to understanding how light can ""disappear""
RC
As already noted by others, no he didn't
I mean off course the
information light contains .
But well, this isn’t my business, but so far I know Stephen hawking invented the “twin Universe” of that reason.
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Infor...ther+data+disappear+down+black...-a0123322418
Actually, black holes really aren't that strange at all. In fact, they don't even require relativity, quantum physics, or anything more advanced that Newton. All you need is a finite speed of light, and black holes are an inevitable logical consequence. Throwing in relativity and quantum physics can generate behaviour that may seem counter-intuitive, but that happens in all kinds of areas and not just with black holes. In fact, in many ways relativity actually makes black holes act in a much more common sense manner, since a Newtonian black hole has some interesting problems of its own.
But since we do not know how much space can stretch / deform this is really a dead end and a BIG problem.
If space continues to deform towards infinity, Stephen Hawking could be right, and things could be very strange. - (But I don’t believe so).
Because this (in the end) is a dead end, from a certain point we only have our imagination left to support us what really going on in a black hole.
I
claims that the jet
must be caused by the black hole.
I also believe that there is a limit for how much space can stretch, and hence that conditions are not as extreme as for example Stephen Hawking believes.
It’s to my opinion an enormously powerful magnetic field driving by invisible matter curling inside the event horizon / black hole.
In this case I believe in “dark matter” - but build on know elementary particles. We can’t see this because space is stretching so much that visible light can’t exist.
Fundamentally black hole is the result of that matter of a galaxy consumes space, the shape of is not ball shaped, but rather funnel shaped.
Orbiting particles give the black hole much stronger attracting force. Spinning space is dragged into the hole.
I also believe that matter can escape, also after reaching the event horizon.
Remember Einstein had a problem to accept the nature of a flexible space.
We are talking about light from an object falling into the black hole, i.e.
Right, but an object doesn’t fall slower because of time dilation (seen from a outside observer). This is only based on believes.
Space too stretches (for sure) . The way we define 1 meter will stretch too, so the fall towards a black hole will from yours perception (outside the hole) appears completely normal.
The cause of the Mercury orbit anomaly is simply misunderstood, and this leads to a lot more misunderstandings or failure to understand for example; space probes and planets affected by “unknown forces” and a much more.
There is A LOT of light inside the hole. And I mean A LOT
Maybe. If so light from billion of years.
If so it’s is stretching from infrared to radio valves.
But to claim this you must
know a lot more.
Especially
- how much can space deform / stretch. ?
- what causes a black hole?
- how much is space affected ?
Can you tell us that ?
Hawking radiation is not light escaping from a black hole.
I did not say that.
And I do not believe the hypothesis either.
One solution to the information paradox is that quantum fluctuations in the event horizon allows information to escape if a black hole evaporates via Hawking radiation.
Maybe, - but only speculation
The twin universe is not for sale
Good I also think a cow is a better investment.
You are nuts if you think that a black hole is anything to do with stretched or contracted space
Carefully where you pee, my first middle name is Measurement. And my second middle name is Headwind.
----
The strength of a black hole is simply depending on how much space can stretch / deform, -and how much it actually does.
We do not know that, or even the cause of it, and hence we are all only speculating of what happens inside of it..
----
! But I can rent you a well-used D-brane 
