Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
We KNOW that thermal heat (the thickness of the crust) and magnetic anomalies are connected. (Research from Anarchic)
http://www.dmi.dk/dmi/oersted_ser_under_isen (Google translate it)
My comments >>> HA HA HA HA HA how funny.The models show the magnetic field anywhere on Earth with high precision and then it is possible to distinguish between contributions from the electric currents in the liquid core 3000 kilometer below and contributions from crust.
The contributions of magnetic minerals in the crust depends on the thickness of the crust down to the limit by the so-called Curie temperature (typically 500-600 ° C), where materials are non-magnetic.
They are detecting the variation in the MF caused by the abundance of magnetic minerals.
You have just stated that thermal heat is oceans: Bjarne's "Big Thermal Box" is the oceans. Oceans are cooler than land. The crust is not hotter under the oceans, just thiner.
Ferromagnetic materials lose strength with heat (~0.1% per degree) and gain strength with cooling.
Your prediction of a correlation is the opposite of what is observed, i.e. no correlation of MF strength with oceans or land.
- The lowest strength of the MF is over a continent (South America). This looks related to the South Atlantic Anomaly.
- The highest strength of the MF is over the ocean between Antarctica and Australia.
- The ocean basins are not correlated with low strength.
- No lessening of the MF in the Indian ocean.
- No lessening of the MF in the Atlantic ocean.
- No lessening of the MF in the Pacific ocean.
- No lessening of the MF in the Arctic ocean.
- The continents are not correlated with high strength.
- The MF is not stronger over North America (but is in the Arctic circle).
- The MF is not stronger over South America and is in fact especially weak.
- The MF is not stronger over Africa.
- The MF is not stronger over Australia.
- It is stronger over Antarctica but is strongest over the ocean not the land.
- There is a strong area over northern Russia. I wonder is this is part of the Kursk Magnetic Anomaly caused by rich iron ore?
We also KNOW that many other places on Earth we find the same FACTWe also KNOW that many other places on Earth we find the same FACT.
We KNOW that the strength of the Earth's magnetic field is not correlation with the oceans or land. This is FACT:
- The crust varies in thickness - the MF does not correlate
The strength of a magnetic field from a ferromagnetic material depends on the amount of the material. There is less crust under oceans and so Bjarne's idea predicts a geographical correlation between the MF strength and oceans.
- The magnetic poles have been measured to be ~5000 kilometers below the surface of the Earth.
This has been known for 172 years
!
Even siller citationRead this;
http://videnskab.dk/content/dk/naturvidenskab/jordens_magnetfelt_andrer_sig_lynhurtigt (Google translate it)
What Oersted satellite meter, is the strength and direction of Earth's magnetic field of approximately 700 km's altitude. Earth's magnetic field generated by flow in the Earth's inner liquid portion, which lies 3000 km under the Earth's surface.
The core consists of iron and nickel, which is melted because of the enormous pressure and high temperature. The metals are as fluid as water, and moves in tandem with Earth's rotation - it creates a strong electric current, and it is these electric currents, which forms the Earth's magnetic field.
"It comes back to us that the changes in the Earth's magnetic field, and hence flow in the Earth's interior is so rapid. This shows that Earth's magnetic field is not as stable as previously thought - may be very large changes in the magnetic field within a few months, "says senior researcher Nils Olsen from DTU Space.
SO BETTER KEEP YOU MOUTH SHUT, and everybody are happy.SO BETTER KEEP YOU MOUTH SHUT, and everybody are happy.