Haig and his Sun caused earthquakes

Multi-millennial-scale solar activity and its influences on continental tropical climate: empirical evidence of recurrent cosmic and terrestrial patterns
Abstract. Solar activity (SA) oscillations over the past millennia are analyzed and extrapolated based on reconstructed solar-related records. Here, simple recurrent models of SA signal are applied and tested. The consequent results strongly suggest: (a) the existence of multi-millennial (~ 9500 years) scale solar oscillations, and (b) their persistence, over at least the last glacial–interglacial cycle. This empirical modelling of solar recurrent oscillations has also provided a consequent multi-millennial-scale experimental forecast, suggesting a solar decreasing trend toward Grand (Super) Minimum conditions for the upcoming period, AD 2050–2250 (AD 3750–4450). Also, a recurrent linear influence of solar variation on continental tropical climate (CTC) has been assessed for the last 20 kyr, and extrapolated for the next centuries. Taking into account the importance of these estimated SA scenarios a comparison is made with other SA forecasts, and their possible associated astronomical forcing and influences on past and future CTC discussed.
Click to expand...
 
Great point :eek:

"Filaments on our Star can erupt at any time with little to no warning and can be just as catastrophic as a large Solar Flare. Many believe the , "Carrington Event" was caused by a Filament release as opposed to a large Solar Flare and that fried Telegraph lines.They have the potential to bring down Electrical Grids just as a large Solar X Flare could."
 
I've not looks into this thread for a few months. Has haig ever presented a coupling mechanism of any kind? A way in which measurable solar output of any form can affect fault lines anywhere from a few meters to a few hundred kilometers below the surface of the earth?
 
Nah, the latest is some unsourced assertion with lots of the common nouns capitalized so you don't overlook any of the Important Words. It's a little difficult to parse but near as I can make out our sun is actually the Flying Spaghetti Monster and it sometimes reaches out and touches Earth with its Noodly Appendage.
 
Haig said:
This is also very relevant to this topic ... perhaps you can see why?
Click to expand...
The reason is that you are mindlessly parroting the delusions of Thunderbolts (the electric universe) idiots, Haig, such as Ben Davidson.
10th April 2015: The ignorance, delusions and lies in the Thunderbolts web site, videos, etc.
Donald Scott is the least deluded of the Thunderbolts authors but still stupid enough to associate with Velikovsky cranks.
The first lie is that "professor". Donald Scott is retired and so not a professor.
The first image shows that video is yet another deluded "I see bunnies in the clouds" rant. The filamentary large scale structure of the universe as predicted by mainstream science has been known about for a couple of decades.
 
Last edited:
Haig: Can you understand that this paper is about multi-millennial-scale effects

Haig said:
Multi-millennial-scale solar activity and its influences on continental tropical climate: empirical evidence of recurrent cosmic and terrestrial patterns
Click to expand...
At last - some science instead of 5th August 2015 Haig: 12 delusions about the Sun and earthquakes. :jaw-dropp!

This paper is about the fact that the Sun is a primary driver of climate change. Changes in solar activity cool and heat the Earth and affect climate. The author identifies a cycle of ~ 9500 years in solar activity.

Let us see if you can understand English or if this is another delusion to be added to your list.

11 August 2015 Haig: Can you understand that the Sánchez-Sesma paper is about multi-millennial-scale effects, not delusions such as the Sun is causing global warming, weather, earthquakes, dandruff :D, etc.
 
Haig said:
Think again Trackar,

The short term variability of the Sun in terms of Earth facing/affecting events such as: flares, coronal holes, filaments, solar wind etc ARE some of the features being suggested as triggers for earthquakes, volcanoes, major weather events ... the evidence mounts ...

Also other things too ;)

"A recent simulation of climate and atmospheric responses to solar spectrum changes using the SIM measurements reported that "the effects of solar variability on temperature throughout the atmosphere may be contrary to current expectations" (Haigh et al. 2010)"
How Does the Sun's Spectrum Vary? PDF
Click to expand...

I thought quite clearly to begin with. Nothing you have presented provides legitimate evidence which compellingly supports your assertions and contentions regarding a casual relationship between solar emissions and terrestrial seismic activity. As for the NASA paper quoted, it doesn't impact or support your claims or contentions.

...Analysis of the SIM spectral irradiance observations during the solar minimum epoch of 2008, when solar activity was essentially invariant, exposes trends in the SIM observations relative to both total solar irradiance and solar activity that are unlikely solar in origin. We suggest that the SIM's radically different solar variability characterization is a consequence of undetected instrument sensitivity drifts, not true solar spectrum changes...
conclusion
SIM's solar spectral irradiance measurements from April 2004 to December 2008 and inferences of their climatic implications are incompatible with the historical solar UV irradiance database, coincident solar proxy data, current understanding of the sources of solar spectral and total irradiance changes, and climate change attribution, but are consistent with known effects of instrument sensitivity drifts, demonstrated to be present in SIM observations during the recent solar minimum period.

In the absence of solar activity in 2008, SIM's ultraviolet irradiance at 240 to 400 nm continued to change and the integrated spectral energy decreased in conflict with the negligible trend in total solar irradiance measured independently by TIM over the same period. The anomalously large decrease in UV energy is likely a result of uncorrected instrumental changes compensating an anomalously large energy increase in the visible and infrared spectrum, also of instrumental origin. Both the UV and visible anomalies are consistent with know changes in instrument sensitivities. There trends in SIM observations independent of solar activity (in 2008) suggest UV measurements uncertainties larger by a factor of 2 to 5 than Harder et al. (2009) report.

Rather than revising current understanding of solar physics and solar variability effects on climate, improved characterization of the SIM observations themselves is needed. Work is in progress to reassess the spectral irradiance variations measured by SORCE SIM and a new, advanced SIM has been designed and is under construction for flight on the Joint Polar Satellite System (P. Pilewskie, private communication, 2011). To prevent future research following a path of unrealistic solar-terrestrial behavior, the SORCE SIM observations should be used with extreme caution in studies of climate and atmospheric change until additional validation and uncertainty estimates of these observations are available.
Click to expand...
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00571.1
 
Jrrarglblarg said:
I've not looks into this thread for a few months. Has haig ever presented a coupling mechanism of any kind? A way in which measurable solar output of any form can affect fault lines anywhere from a few meters to a few hundred kilometers below the surface of the earth?
Click to expand...


Yipe, scroll back to see the hypothesis story so far including some peer reviewed papers.

Here is a good starting point HERE


Some pointers too in the latest update on our variable star ...

Yellow River, Death of Light, Space Weather | S0 News August 11, 2015
 
Haig said:
Yipe, scroll back to see the hypothesis story so far including some peer reviewed papers.

Here is a good starting point HERE
Click to expand...

that pdf is mot a peer reviewed paper, they are searching for for people to read it and comment on it. it is badly written and will most likely never be published in a respectable journal.
 
Haig: 13 delusions about the Sun and earthquakes since 2 June 2015

Usual links to crank videos rather than answering a question which is not a surprise since we have 5 June 2015 Haig: Some of the ignorance, fantasies, delusions and even lies that you have believed in since 2010..
  1. 4 May 2015 Haig: The scientific evidence is that there is no connection between solar activity and earthquakes.
  2. 13 May 2015 Haig: The fantasies of Suspicious0bservers are not scientific evidence!
  3. 27 May 2015 Haig: Can you understand that Schnepf et. al is not about the Sun or earthquakes (no matter what delusions Ben Davidson may have about it!) ?
  4. 2 June 2015 Haig: Can you understand that ignorant comments on a crank web site are not scientific evidence.
  5. 2 June 2015 Haig: Four points of delusion in your 30 May 2015 post
  6. 4 June 2015 Haig: Your ignorance about Scott, et. al. and a fantasy about its results does not mean that the Sun causes earthquakes when the scientific evidence is that it does not!.
  7. 4 June 2015 Haig: Another abysmal mistake about science (plasma tubes in this case)
  8. 4 June 2015 Haig: A fantasy that Mostl et. al. has anything to do with earthquakes.
  9. 8 June 2015 Haig: Can you understand that Ben Davison lied about Antarctica ice melting?
  10. 9 June 2015 Haig: Why Ben Davidson's Sun -> earthquake videos are evidence of his delusions (not science!)
  11. 11 June 2015: Haig: It is idiotic to cite a video of Earth's Role as an Electromagnet and the Creation of Auroras in a thread about the Sun and earthquakes
  12. 4 August 2014 Haig: The delusion that a PDF on a crank web site by unqualified authors is scientific literature :jaw-dropp!
  13. 11 August 2015 Haig: Can you understand that the Sánchez-Sesma paper is about multi-millennial-scale effects, not delusions such as the Sun is causing global warming, weather, earthquakes, dandruff , etc.
 
Haig said:
What in the pdf is badly written? Examples please!
Click to expand...
Why should anyone waste their time explaining this to someone who has held onto the delusion that comets are rocks for many years despite knowing the several ways that the density of comets has been measured to be less than that of water, Haig?
5 June 2015 Haig: Some of the ignorance, fantasies, delusions and even lies that you have believed in since 2010.

Or the delusions in this thread: 12 August 2015 Haig: 13 delusions about the Sun and earthquakes since 2 June 2015
 
Haig said:
Latest update on our variable star and the earthquake watch.
Click to expand...
Latest delusions: 12 August 2015 Haig: 13 delusions about the Sun and earthquakes since 2 June 2015

Talking about the paper:
14 August 2015 Haig: Do you have the delusion that Davidson et. al. is about Ben Davidson's fantasy that solar flares, CME, coronal holes cause earthquakes?

Davidson et. al. is about >M8 earthquakes and the solar magnetic field.
Ben Davidson has the delusion that solar flares, CME, coronal holes cause swarms of earthquakes of any size. His latest delusion is to link a coronal hole with a cherry picked swarm of earthquakes.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom