Can we control the temperature of Earth?

Lets throw in: Magnetization of the earth's crust

Oh and:
The crust as the possible seat of earth's magnetism
J. S. Chatterjee
Institute of Radio Physics and Electronics, Calcutta University, India
Received 10 November 1955. Available online 28 March 2003.
Abstract
The crust of the earth is discussed as a possible seat of the magnetization of the earth. It is shown that the temperature and pressure to which the crust (a thickness of about 20 km) of the earth is subjected, will make its magnetic mineral contents (e.g., magnetite) highly permeable. The shell can thus be magnetically saturated by a field of very low intensity of the order of 0.01 gauss. It is suggested that the magnetizing field is provided by the “ring current” formed in the space round the earth, during worldwide magnetic storms, as a result of the encounter of the solar neutral corpuscular beams (consisting of an equal number of positive and negative charges) with the earth-magnet. It is shown that an initially existing field of even one-hundredth of the present field is enough to build up the magnetization of the crust to saturation.
An explanation of the secular variation is also suggested as caused by the ring current trying to follow (with a lag) the wobbling motion of the magnetic axis round the geographical axis due to the diurnal rotation of the earth.
Click to expand...
(my emphasis added)
FYI Bjarne, "saturation" means that it cannot increase any more. This 1955 paper calculates that the maximum magnetic field from the crust is ~0.01 gauss. The Earth's magnetic field is 0.3 to 0.6 gauss. 0.01 is a lot less than 0.3.
 
Last edited:
I wonder why the National Geophysical Data Center thinks that
The magnetic field at or near the surface of the Earth is a combination of Earth's magnetic field and fields of external (solar) origin. The Earth's magnetic field is itself a superposition of the field generated by the geodynamo in the liquid outer core (main field) and the field of magnetized rocks in the crust and upper mantle. The main field dominates the long wavelengths, down to about 3000 km, whereas the crustal field dominates at wavelengths smaller than 2500 km.
A very convenient way of representing geomagnetic fields is to expand the scalar magnetic potential into spherical harmonic functions. Such a model can then be evaluated at any desired location to provide the magnetic field vector, its direction, or the anomaly of the total intensity of the field. The NGDC-720 model provides such an expansion for the crustal field from spherical harmonic degree 16 to 720, corresponding to the waveband of 2500 km to 56 km. The degree 720 cut-off corresponds to an angular wavelength of 30 arc minutes, providing a 15 arc minute model resolution.
Click to expand...

In case you think it is just the Americans:
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES VOL. 10, ES4003, doi:10.2205/2007ES000258, 2008
The actual magnetic field of the Earth consists of a sum of several contributions: from the nucleus (the main geomagnetic field), from the crust (the field of local anomalies) and from magnetosphere (the field of sources, external in relation to the Earth's volume). The biggest contribution into the magnetic field of the Earth is made by the main magnetic field; even if you imagine that the Earth's crust (the layer ~30 km, the lower rock doesn't get magnetized due to exceeding the Curie point) is totally composed of strongly magnetized rock (basalt and gabbro), then the contribution of the Earth crust would equal only to a few per cent of the field observed [Sharma, 1989].
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
In case you think it is just the Americans:
Click to expand...
It should not surprise me that it also is mentioned in the bible.

(But still you have not a problem, but plenty. – Just keep closing you eyes for these, and the problems doesn’t exist)..

Amen..
 
Reality Check said:
This 1955 paper calculates that the maximum magnetic field from the crust is ~0.01 gauss. The Earth's magnetic field is 0.3 to 0.6 gauss. 0.01 is a lot less than 0.3.
Click to expand...

What is calculated is quite irrelevant - remember, math is a deceptive and fraudulent disciple, only invented because 2000 years ago some Greeks foresaw that we would need it today to maliciously manipulate Bjarnes brilliant hypothesis into complete crap.
 
What is calculated is quite irrelevant - remember, math is a deceptive and fraudulent disciple, only invented because 2000 years ago some Greeks foresaw that we would need it today to maliciously manipulate Bjarnes brilliant hypothesis into complete crap.
Click to expand...

It is proven that math can prove something that does not exist.

In this case, - the “smart thing” is we can decide what we what to put into any equation.

  • If we believe that heat flow true the crust (convection) of the Earth mainly happens below the ocean crust, this important factor is ignored.
  • If we do not understand that heat flow (convection) is important factor to integrate local chaotic to a global field MF, this factor is ignored.
  • If we do not understand that heat flow in the magnetic collision area makes it possible for fragmented magnetic blocks to integrate, this important factor is ignored.
Notice that disagreement is only a factor 1 : 20 (max 1 : 50 at the poles)

Or in other words, small local and chaotic MF on Mars does max reach 1500 nT
Compared to the = Earth 30.000 nT (South Atlantic) and 65.000 nT at the poles.

You know the MF on Mars there is many small local and chaotic MF reaching 1500 nT .
These are of cause not integrated, and points to 1 million directions.

  • These are “only” 50 times stronger than the MF on Earth MNP/MSP
  • These are “only” 15 times stronger then the Earth MF by its equator (South Atlantic Anomaly)
  • These are only 2 to 4 times stronger that the Earth MF in the period of magnetic chaos the earth goes through.
Now let’s imaging that you would be the first man on Mars, and that you are landing exactly between the 7 biggest Magnetic Anomalies.

With you, - you would have the latest (science fiction) technology to heat up 1000 square km of the crust of Mars.

You would now heat up the crust of Mars exactly where the 2 biggest MF collides.
And you would also randomly heat up the areas in and between the 7 biggest magnetic areas.
What would happen when this area (except the area where to 2 strongest MF collides) cools down again?

Can you see for you self, that this MF of Mars is no longer “only” 1500 nT when you leave? – But rather now 3 or 4000 nT.

Heatstrem.jpg


No you can not.
Simply because you don’t want to understand what the imaging above shows could be a fact.

Don’t say that the MF in rocks are too weak to integrate locally.
It happens on Mars.
What should prevent it to happen globally?
It’s all a question of magnetic integration.

What can math do for a man, when the right brain half is almost dead, or brainwashed?
Can such man put in the “correct values” in equation?
Or does the attempt to do so reflect half brained concrete creeds?
Strange that the outcome (result) is like it is ?
No off course not.

Religious people admit that they believes in this and that god. This is fair.
But many “scientist” sells believes to innocent peoples wrapped with half brained math, with the inscription; Certain knowledge. This is not fair.

This is not only cheating, but fanaticism, because many "salesmen’s" even don’t know they are cheating. – Many are so brain washed they fully believe it is facts the sell. What a shame.

The Geo-Dynamo is in fact even not a theory.
  • It is not proven experimentally (only chaotic magnetic fluctuation is proven)
  • Its is not observed.
The fact that the magnetic lines goes straight into the Earth at the poles, doesn’t proves that the geodynamic is a fact but only that we don not know enough about magnetism can behave.

It’s really simple, so long we are below Curies, Ferro magnetism “leads” the magnetic flow.
Above Curie (Para magnetism) a MF’s power lines can bend almost so much these want, - when force to it.
There is no need to invent a Geo-dynamo, but only to understand how a MF acts when.

And worse at all, several fact shows that a Geo dynamo impossible can comprehend reality.

For example these fact can’t be adapted to a geo-dynamo (except only bal bla bla…..)
  • The fact that variation of the strength of the Earth magnetic field and global temperatures are coincident, - and that fits perfectly to a ferro-magnetic model, and a much better coherent overall understanding of much more.
  • The facts that in period the Earth magnetic field is so weak that it remind of the magnetic field of Mars, that doesn’t have any inner dynamo, but only a weak and chaotic ferro magnetic crust field. - In these periods not the worlds must stupid cow can see any need for a inner dynamo.
  • The South Atlantic Anomaly can’t be explained by a inner dynamo muddle, but a ferro magnetic crust theory doesn’t have that problem.
  • The many of the crust anomalies can’t be explain by the geo speculation, - but a ferro magnetic field combined with thermal heat flow doesn’t have that problem.
  • The coincidence between thermal heat and magnetic anomalies can not be explained by a inner dynamo speculation, but a ferro magnetic crust field theory doesn’t have that problem.
And worse at all, even though the worlds most stupid cow, wouldn’t ever even dream that is it’s possible to “connect” global temperature with the geo-speculation, simple because it is complete cow-logic impossible.
This in fact contradict the Geo-D-speculation even at cow-logic-level.
And hence bla bla bla is not the way further...
A ferro MF doesn’t have that cow-logic contradiction.
------

I too can makesome math magic :

The magnetism of; Local Area + local Area + local Area + local Area + local Area + local Area+ local Area + local Area + + local Area + local Area + Area + local Area + local Area + local Area + local Area + local Area+ local Area + local Area + + local Area + local Area + = multiple factor 20 to 50 depending on where you are. (30 - 65.000 nT)

Or if you prefer
1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT = 30.000 nT

So now fellows, bend you for the math realty.
 
What is calculated is quite irrelevant - remember, math is a deceptive and fraudulent disciple, only invented because 2000 years ago some Greeks foresaw that we would need it today to maliciously manipulate Bjarnes brilliant hypothesis into complete crap.
Click to expand...

It is proven that math can prove something that does not exist.

In this case, - the “smart thing” is we can decide what we what to put into any equation.

  • If we believe that heat flow true the crust (convection) of the Earth mainly happens below the ocean crust, this important factor is ignored.
  • If we do not understand that heat flow (convection) is important factor to integrate local chaotic to a global field MF, this factor is ignored.
  • If we do not understand that heat flow in the magnetic collision area makes it possible for fragmented magnetic blocks to integrate, this important factor is ignored.
Notice that disagreement is only a factor 1 : 20 (max 1 : 50 at the poles)

Or in other words, small local and chaotic MF on Mars does max reach 1500 nT
Compared to the = Earth 30.000 nT (South Atlantic) and 65.000 nT at the poles.

You know the MF on Mars there is many small local and chaotic MF reaching 1500 nT .
These are of cause not integrated, and points to 1 million directions.

  • These are “only” 50 times stronger than the MF on Earth MNP/MSP
  • These are “only” 15 times stronger then the Earth MF by its equator (South Atlantic Anomaly)
  • These are only 2 to 4 times stronger that the Earth MF in the period of magnetic chaos the earth goes through.
Now let’s imaging that you would be the first man on Mars, and that you are landing exactly between the 7 biggest Magnetic Anomalies.

With you, - you would have the latest (science fiction) technology to heat up 1000 square km of the crust of Mars.

You would now heat up the crust of Mars exactly where the 2 biggest MF collides.
And you would also randomly heat up the areas in and between the 7 biggest magnetic areas.
What would happen when this area (except the area where to 2 strongest MF collides) cools down again?

Can you see for you self, that this MF of Mars is no longer “only” 1500 nT when you leave? – But rather now 3 or 4000 nT.

Heatstrem.jpg


No you can not.
Simply because you don’t want to understand what the imaging above shows could be a fact.

Don’t say that the MF in rocks are too weak to integrate locally.
It happens on Mars.
What should prevent it to happen globally?
It’s all a question of magnetic integration.

What can math do for a man, when the right brain half is almost dead, or brainwashed?
Can such man put in the “correct values” in equation?
Or does the attempt to do so reflect half brained concrete creeds?
Strange that the outcome (result) is like it is ?
No off course not.

Religious people admit that they believes in this and that god. This is fair.
But many “scientist” sells believes to innocent people, - wrapped with half brained math, and with the inscription; Certain knowledge. This is not fair.

This is not only cheating, but fanaticism, because many "salesmen’s" even don’t know they are cheating. – Many are so brain washed they fully believe it is facts the sell. What a shame.

The Geo-Dynamo is in fact even not a theory.
  • It is not proven experimentally (only chaotic magnetic fluctuation is proven)
  • Its is not observed.
The fact that the magnetic lines goes straight into the Earth at the poles, doesn’t proves that the geodynamic is a fact but rather, - only that we don't know enough about how magnetism can behave.

It’s really simple, so long we are below Curies, Ferro magnetism “leads” the magnetic flow.
Above Curie (Para magnetism) a MF’s power lines can bend almost so much these want, - when force to it.
There is no need to invent a Geo-dynamo, but only to understand how a MF act.

And worse at all, several fact shows that a Geo dynamo impossible can comprehend reality.

For example these fact can’t be adapted to a geo-dynamo (except only bal bla bla…..)
  • The fact that variation of the strength of the Earth magnetic field and global temperatures are coincident, - and that fits perfectly to a ferro-magnetic model, and a much better coherent overall understanding of much more.
  • The facts that in period the Earth magnetic field is so weak that it remind of the magnetic field of Mars, that doesn’t have any inner dynamo, but only a weak and chaotic ferro magnetic crust field. - In these periods not the worlds must stupid cow can see any need for a inner dynamo.
  • The South Atlantic Anomaly can’t be explained by a inner dynamo muddle, but a ferro magnetic crust theory doesn’t have that problem.
  • The many of the crust anomalies can’t be explain by the geo speculation, - but a ferro magnetic field combined with thermal heat flow doesn’t have that problem.
  • The coincidence between thermal heat and magnetic anomalies can not be explained by a inner dynamo speculation, but a ferro magnetic crust field theory doesn’t have that problem.
And worse at all, even though the worlds most stupid cow, wouldn’t ever even dream that is it’s possible to “connect” global temperature with the geo-speculation, simple because it is complete cow-logic impossible.
This in fact contradict the Geo-D-speculation even at cow-logic-level.
And hence bla bla bla is not the way further...
A ferro MF doesn’t have that cow-logic contradiction.

I too can make some math magic :

The magnetism of;
Local Area + local Area + local Area + local Area + local Area + local Area+ local Area + local Area + local Area + local Area + Area + local Area + local Area + local Area + local Area + local Area+ local Area + local Area + local Area + local Area + = multiple factor 20 to 50 depending on where you are.

Or if you prefer;
1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT + 1500nT + 1500nT+ 1500nT = 30.000 nT

So now fellows, bend you for the math realety.
------
 
Last edited:
Crustal magnetism is < 2% of the Earth's magnetism

This seems to be a fact documented in geophysics textbooks rather than the internet. I have found one paper on the subject:
The crust as the possible seat of earth's magnetism
J. S. Chatterjee
Institute of Radio Physics and Electronics, Calcutta University, India
Received 10 November 1955. Available online 28 March 2003.
Abstract
The crust of the earth is discussed as a possible seat of the magnetization of the earth. It is shown that the temperature and pressure to which the crust (a thickness of about 20 km) of the earth is subjected, will make its magnetic mineral contents (e.g., magnetite) highly permeable. The shell can thus be magnetically saturated by a field of very low intensity of the order of 0.01 gauss. It is suggested that the magnetizing field is provided by the “ring current” formed in the space round the earth, during worldwide magnetic storms, as a result of the encounter of the solar neutral corpuscular beams (consisting of an equal number of positive and negative charges) with the earth-magnet. It is shown that an initially existing field of even one-hundredth of the present field is enough to build up the magnetization of the crust to saturation.
An explanation of the secular variation is also suggested as caused by the ring current trying to follow (with a lag) the wobbling motion of the magnetic axis round the geographical axis due to the diurnal rotation of the earth.
Click to expand...
(my emphasis added)
This 1955 paper calculates that the maximum magnetic field from the crust is ~0.01 gauss. The Earth's magnetic field is 0.3 to 0.6 gauss. 0.01 is a lot less than 0.3.


Other references to the crustal magnetic field being less than <2% of the Earth's come from lecture notes and the fact that it is treated separately from the core magnetic field:
Google Scholar gives ~800 results for "crustal magnetic field" (many about Mars).
 
Bjarne said:
But many “scientist” sells believes to innocent people, - wrapped with half brained math, and with the inscription; Certain knowledge. This is not fair.
Click to expand...

Ooh you mean "beliefs" like water treatment, modern agriculture, health care, transportation infrastructure and fiber optics?

All "beliefs" that ensures that Bjarne has clothes, clean water, food on the table, healthy kids and an internet connection through which to sprout his less-than-accurate speculations.

Seriously, I get a little grumpy when crackpots piss on the accumulated knowledge of mankind in this manner while blizzfully forgetting that they owe haft their existence to it. Shame on Bjarne!




Bjarne said:
The South Atlantic Anomaly can’t be explained by a inner dynamo muddle, but a ferro magnetic crust theory doesn’t have that problem.
Click to expand...

I find this statement a bit odd. Firstly no scientist have ever claimed that the south atlantic anomaly is created by the inner dynamo. It has been known for years that this anomaly is caused by the Van Allen Belts of charged cosmic particles, trapped in the Earth's magnetic field. Bjarne has been told this before.

Ignoring that fact for the moment, let's focus on Bjarnes claim that this anomaly is intrinsic for a ferromagnetic crust model. Well then how exactly does the Van Allen belts fit into the picture? They are really out there you know, and they would still create an anomaly of low field strength. So we should see an even bigger anomaly in the south atlantic ocean if Bjarne had his way, and yet we do not.
 
Last edited:
I think we have been it all through..........
Off course I am willing to admit there have been reasons to different speculation in different directions.
Many serious people have contributed to solve the cause of the Earth magnetic field.
But when this is said, we also have to admit that we have not succeeded , simply because many phenomena’s can’t be adapted to the prevailing believes.

  • The fact that variation of the strength of the Earth magnetic field and global temperatures are coincident, - and that fits perfectly to a ferro-magnetic model, and a much better coherent overall understanding of much more.
  • The facts that in period the Earth magnetic field is so weak that it remind of the magnetic field of Mars, that doesn’t have any inner dynamo, but only a weak and chaotic ferro magnetic crust field. - In these periods not the worlds must stupid cow can see any need for a inner dynamo.
  • The South Atlantic Anomaly can’t be explained by a inner dynamo muddle, but a ferro magnetic crust theory doesn’t have that problem.
  • The many of the crust anomalies can’t be explain by the geo speculation, - but a ferro magnetic field combined with thermal heat flow doesn’t have that problem.
  • The coincidence between thermal heat and magnetic anomalies can not be explained by a inner dynamo speculation, but a ferro magnetic crust field theory doesn’t have that problem.
Especially lets the following fact below hang in the air:
The worlds most stupid cow, wouldn’t ever even dream that is it’s possible to “connect” global temperature with the geo-speculation, simple because it is complete cow-logic impossible.
This in fact contradict the Geo-D-speculation even at cow-logic-level.
And hence bla bla bla is not the way further...
A ferro MF doesn’t have that cow-logic contradiction.

Consider WHAT is that coincidence about
DO NOT JUST IGNORE IT. - PLEASE

How can we reasonable adapt this fact to a coherent none contradicting picture?
 
Flaws in and outstanding questions about Bjarne's MF idea

Bjarne has an idea that the Earth's magnetic field is generated by ferromagnets in the Earth's crust and the solar wind.The flaws in this idea are easy to see:
  1. The magnetic poles have been measured to be ~5000 kilometers below the surface of the Earth.
    This has been known for 172 years :eye-poppi !
  2. The solar wind does not change the overall strength of the Earth's MF at any time.
    It has even stopped without any effects on the MF.
    AFAIK The strength of the MF does not vary as the Magnetic North Pole moves around the Artic Ocean nor with the strength of the solar wind as it is in the "central Artic ocean". But I am sure Bjarne can correct me with many scientific papers showing just that :rolleyes: .

  3. Crustal magnetism is < 2% of the Earth's magnetism!
    Bjarne, if you have sources that contradict this please cite them.
    Rocks aren't strongly enough magnetized to account for the observed geomagnetic field
    First asked 16 February 2010
At this point his idea is totally invalid. There is no point in looking at it any more but there are even more flaws
  1. The crust varies in thickness - the MF does not correlate
    AFAIK, The strength of a magnetic field from a ferromagnetic material depends on the amount of the material. There is less crust under oceans and so Bjarne's idea predicts a geographical correlation between the MF strength and oceans.
  2. MF reversals are not explained by Bjarne's idea
    The only ways that I can think of to reverse the MF in his idea are to turn the Earth's crust inside out or to heat it all up to ~800K and apply an external field.
    First Asked 2 March 2010
    I am currently trying to get him to explain his MF reversal in simple terms but just fantasies so far.
Then there is the evidence of his lack of knowledge of physics:
Questions that he is unable to answer coherently:
  1. What magnetic field is predicted by a ferromagnetic crust model?
    First asked 15 February 2010
  2. Sources to support your assertion that the Earth's MF strength is influenced by the solar wind at any time
    First asked 16 February 2010
    The physical evidence is that the solar wind obviously shapes the Earth's magnetosphere. Geomagnetic storms can even influence the Earth's surface over short periods. But when the solar wind varies (or even stops) the overall strength of the MF does not change.
  3. What creates your Big Box of Thermal Heat?
    First asked 26 February 2010
    He seems to think that oceanic crust is hotter than continental crust. As far as I know, he is wrong. He can prove me wrong with some citations to the literature that he is using for his idea.
  4. What about the magnetic field of the Moon?
    First asked 1 March 2010
    So far just vague stuff about thermal heat, e.g. "Simply because the Moon do not have thermal Heat". But a lack of "thermal heat" increases the MF strength of ferromagnetic materials!
 
Aitch said:
OK...
Click to expand...

Don’t underestimate cows.
Theirs brains are 4 times as big as ours.
Furthermore cows are not brainwashing each other, they are simply too intelligent to do such
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
Don’t underestimate cows.
Theirs brains are 4 times as big as ours.
Click to expand...
Actually, according to this and this, cows brains are about one third the weight of human brains.
Bjarne said:
Furthermore cows are not brainwashing each other, they are simply too intelligent to do such
Click to expand...
Any evidence to support that? Or are you now making up biological 'facts' to go with your physics 'facts'?
 
Actually, according to this and this, cows brains are about one third the weight of human brains.
Click to expand...
It's properly all the lead from the car exhaust that makes the difference.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom